• comfortably wrong

    Breaking is easier than building.

    Following is easier than leading.

    Believing is easier than understanding.

    It’s not that we want to call anyone lazy, but there are certain leanings that are definitely the easier path, and the more comfortable choice to be made.  It’s easy to shout and stomp your feet that something isn’t working, but finding a solution that works for the most people is the hard choice. It’s easy to tag along with a bit of so-called common sense, but trying to understand if that kind of advice is more common than sense takes work.

    Conviction isn’t hard. It’s merely stable… in the same way that a rock has conviction to never move no matter where it happened to tumble and block the path.

    Buying into a political position that has trickled down through your family or just neatly aligns with the people you happen to hang out with? That isn’t brave, or bold nor does it make you anything but a rock. 

    It’s comfortable. It’s low effort. It’s surrender. And it’s a waste of your voice.

  • it’s a circle, duh

    We hear so much about the political spectrum, left versus right, that I think we’ve fallen into the trap of thinking that its an idea to be understood as drawn upon a straight line. That going back and forth is kind of a tug of war and no matter how far we go, it just keeps getting better for “our side” of the political game.

    But it is not a line. And pulling further doesn’t get us further from the ideas we fear.

    I propose that we think of political ideology instead as a circle, and to mark out the points we can make the various political ideas as the hour marks upon an imaginary political clock. With that as our metaphor, lets put twelve o’clock at the top as being a stable centrist democracy.

    In that configuration, liberalism, leftism, or liberal democracy is at about 11 o’clock. Old school conservative democracy, what we would call the fiscal federalist Conservatives here in Canada, tends to hang their hats at about 1 o’clock.

    Now, let’s push a little further.

    I would put liberal socialism, that pooling of public resources, lets-look-after-each-other brand of politics as a social accounting exercise along the lines of the NDP in Canada sitting firm around 10 o’clock and maybe sometimes leaning towards 9 o’clock with their more aggressive policies. Likewise, the social conservative movement, our modern conservatives here in Canada, you know hard-core capitalism and individualism, the separatism movement in Alberta as my go-to example, and too the religious right, well, they are maybe even pushing past 2 o’clock and are often found leaning in to the 3 o’clock mark on the circle with their policies.

    If you are keeping track you may have noticed that (a) this is where most people take the top half of our imaginary political clock from 9 until 3 and put it on a straight line and don’t think about where those lines lead and (b) that we don’t yet have any marks on the lower half of our imaginary political clock.

    But, let’s keep going.

    In the lower half of the circle, calling these political ideas democracy is no longer a fair assessment.

    So with that said, at around 8 o’clock we probably have socialism, yes, bad. But then going a bit further round at about 7 o’clock on the dial let’s put full on capital-C Communism, very bad, and definitely not democratic or a place someone who has spent most of their lives in a democratic society wants to live. Yes, if you push too far left you may eventually get there.

    But then, and we’ve got to be fair and map this out properly, in fairness to the risks of moving left, let’s now push into the risks of moving further right on our imaginary political clock. As that counterpoint, we could easily drop modern American Nationalist movement, aka MAGA, at about 4 o’clock and probably keep going clockwise to put full on fascism at 5 o’clock on our metaphorical political timepiece.

    If you are keeping track maybe you will have noticed that if you keep going it is a short leap down to the autocratic dictatorship line which I would chime at precisely 6 o’clock on our pretend political clock.

    Not a line. It is a circle, and both political directions lead to the same place.

    Then, still again thinking of this as a big old circle, ask yourself it really even matters how you got to that lower half of the clock or what label you give it, is it even democracy anymore? And are you pushing us back to high noon? Or are you putting your weight onto the hands pulling them with all your might to the bottom?

  • unreal truths

    One of the tactics of propagandists, you know… people and organizations bent on twisting your mind and opinion to their will, is to dehumanize the alternate opinion to diminish contrary viewpoints.

    This happens on all sides, but I will tell you about one specific example that is dividing our province even today.

    A few years ago the ruling conservative party here in Alberta set out on a political junket and struck upon the idea of dividing the people in half by claiming that there were “real” Albertans and… well, you decide the other half of that equation.

    It was not a claim based on evidence or any valid merit. It was a claim based on a gut inclination, telling one group, largely rural, that they were more valuable than the other group, largely urban. It was meant to divide. It was meant to enrage. It was meant to control.

    Control?

    Control the so-called “real” people for the sake of spreading misinformation through the cracks of the flattery, maybe. Control the so called “real” people by sweetening the toxic ideas with a bit of sugarcoating, probably.

    Years later I am still encountering that exact divisive rhetoric online. Folks who were enamoured with being “picked” to be on the “real” team not just leaning into their favourite child syndrome but using it as a lever to dismiss contrary opinions. Failing to challenge their own role in a misinformation machine. Ignoring the pleas of family, friends and neighbours reaching out to them to rethink their radicalization.

    “You’re not real so you don’t count.”  They say, and dig themselves a little deeper into the control of their flatterers.

    This is just my example, how my government is dividing my home with misinformation but it happens all across time and geography. It has been a tool of countless regimes and every dark movement in history.

    But… if the crux of your argument is that the other side is not worthy of an opinion, then you’ve already lost something greater than the argument. 

categories

about

Welcome aboard.

This site was started in January 2026 to write more against the rising tide of Alberta separatism, a rot of grievance and divisiveness nurtured by dark foreign influences that is threatening to tear apart our country, our livelihoods and our future for the petty greed a few bought players.

My opinions are my own.